![photoshop cs5 for mac photoshop cs5 for mac](https://pesktop.com/SVVgyNRGinvtEbQV9G8qEJ6P4CQt2uTGGEMV1Ko7gGQ/w:700/h:400/rt:fill/el:1/wm:0.8:soea:16:16:0.2/aHR0cHM6Ly9wZXNrdG9wLmNvbS91cGxvYWRzLzNhNzA4YTk3YjM1NmQ5YzJhMTJiYTA1N2EyNmVmZWUzLmpwZw.jpg)
It's ancient software that Adobe stopped supporting a long time ago. I would be grateful if the Apple moderator could justify why it was impossible to make an allowance for 32-bit software to function within the Mojave OS and whether this is being looked into.Īpple didn't turn the lights out on anything. But here, we are supposed to just say, "ah well.".
#Photoshop cs5 for mac update
There is something very unethical about this If everybody's seven year old car suddenly stopped working and was rendered useless because a software update there would be a public outcry. I don't need the latest tweaks (which i probably wouldn't use anyway) and I wouldn't have updated to Mojave if I'd have been warned that any software pre-xxxx year would be rendered unusable. I realise that I can now go to adobe and shell out approx £50 per month for the latest Photoshop and Indesign but why is this deemed to be acceptable when the software that I had worked perfectly well for my needs prior to the Mojave update. Whilst I appreciate Kurt's comment that there isn't much to answer, and VikingOSX's post illustrating that CS5 is not supported, it is nevertheless extremely frustrating that Apple can just turn off the lights to what was a very expensive piece of software. Unfortunately the read-write solution didn't work for me.